2012 English Adventure
Monday, May 7, 2012
Monday, April 16, 2012
If I Ran the Zoo
In “If I Ran the Zoo” John Leo is talking about how if he
ran the zoo (school) he would make a few
changes. He says that he would make it so there were basically no fun mythological
classes that can be taken for an easy A. He also says that he would hire more
teachers, and I am assuming that he is doing this so students are able to take
the right amount of classes and they do not have to fight over spots in a
class. I also think that John Leo is trying to say that TAs do not get paid enough
for the amount of work they put in. So, he hopes to pay the TAs more and give
them more credit for their job. Finally I think that John Leo is trying to cut
out remedial classes because the teachers for those classes just give out the A
so the students pass the class. He says that they should study more at home and
put in the extra effort and work for their grades. All of Leo’s points are
valid and I agree with everything that he said.
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
Begging for Change
When I went to UCLA with my roommate a couple of weeks ago I saw a homeless couple on the side of the street. They were carrying signs that said that they were begging for change because they used to be teachers, but they got pink slipped and were now forced to stand on the sidewalk begging for change. I felt really bad for them, and my roommate and I gave them some spare change that was in the car.
Sunday, March 11, 2012
Homelessness Articles Journal Entry
“The Meanest Cities”, by America
talks about the different views on homelessness in the United States. It
discusses how some cities, especially in Florida are extremely unkind and
basically think that homelessness is and should be a crime. However, it also
talks about how other cities in the United States think that the homeless
should be helped and they should be provided with opportunities that will help
them break out of their stage of homelessness.
“Brother Don’t Spare a Dime” talks
about how the it’s the homeless peoples fault for the situations that they are
in. The article talks about a few different cases where somebody lent them a
hand, and they took the help, but then just went straight back to the lives
they had been living while they were homeless. The article also talks about how
the people that are homeless chose the lifestyle that they are living and they
think it is easier to live that way, rather than put in hard work to get a
better lifestyle.
“Throw the Bums Out” talks about a
man named John Derbyshire, a business man who took a trip to San Francisco. On
this trip he noticed how many homeless people were in San Francisco and he went
to visit some of the local attractions and he noticed that in the very
expensive new library that costs $10 to get in. The reason that it costs money
to get in the library is because they do not want homeless people to use the
bathrooms, and they do not want the homeless to think it is a place to “hangout”.
I think that these articles have
some good points about homelessness, but there are other things that I do not
agree with. In “Brother Don’t Spare a Dime”, I agree that the homeless should
try and get back on their feet, and not take advantage of people, but I do also
think that some of the people just think it is easier to hangout on the
streets. In “the Meanest Cities” I do not agree with the fact that some people
think that homelessness should be a crime. Some homeless do not choose to be
like that. Some of them are on the streets because there has been a tragedy in
their lives and the only place to go is the street. Just because these people do not have a home does not mean
that they are not human beings. It is their right as a U.S. citizen to live
anywhere they please. They should not be penalized for trying to get some
sleep.
Monday, March 5, 2012
Final Draft Parenting
Walls vs. Real Parents
The
Glass Castle tells a story of a family with two parents who were far from
ordinary parents who care and nurture their children. In fact, it can be said
that Rex and Rose Mary Walls were, in many ways, unfit parents because they let
their children do what they wanted with little guidance and also subjected them
many times to squalor and hunger. However, although Rex and Rose Mary were
basically dysfunctional parents and could have had their children taken away
from them, they obviously were not all that bad for their children because, in
the end, the Walls children managed to grow up fairly successful.
Many times, the living conditions
for the Walls family were far from manageable. For instance, in Welch, they
lived in a house that was falling apart and had no indoor plumbing. If any
employee of social services were to see this house, the children would be
immediately removed and put into foster car, which, undoubtedly, seems like the
best thing for them at the time. However if the Walls children were to be
raised in foster care, not only would the family be separated and torn apart,
but the children would not have learned the same life lessons that they did
growing up with Rex and Rose Mary. Rex and Rose Mary cared just enough about
their children to keep them around, but if it were any worse Child Protective Services
could have easily taken their children. Rex and Rose Mary did teach their
children a lot about the world and they were very intelligent, but they barely
got by on the basic necessities.
Rex and Rose Mary taught their
children many lessons about life and because they moved so much the children
were exposed to places that most children have not ever seen and probably will
not see. One of the things that Rose Mary taught her children was that
“you should never hate anyone, even your worst enemies.” "Everyone has
something good about them," she said. "You have to find the redeeming
quality and love the person for that" (144). In Arizona, the kids
learned about the stars from Rex when he explained which stars were part of
constellations. As a special gift, he gave each of the children a star and said
that they could have it forever. This was in fact a lie, they could not
actually have the star, but the children did not know that and they probably
never will. In Battle Mountain, Jeannette learned how to “sink or swim”(Walls
66), literally. Rex teaches Jeannette how to swim by
literally forcing her to sink or swim. Rex trained Jeannette to stay afloat so
she did not get thrown back into the water. This strategy is representative of
Rose Mary and Rex's general approach to parenting. Refusing to coddle their
children, they often present them with challenges, some life threatening, that
the children are forced to handle.
When the Walls family moved to Welch,
the children really relied on each other to survive. Their parents had become
very neglectful towards the children and they were put on the back burner
because their own lives were more important than their children’s lives. Rose
Mary had gone off to a summer class and came back and only wanted to paint. She
did not want to go back to work; all she wanted to do was paint. This also
meant that she did not want to cook either. 'Mom didn't like
cooking much--"Why spend the afternoon making a meal that will be gone in
an hour," she'd ask us, "when in the same amount of time, I can do a
painting that will last forever?"--so once a week or so, she'd fix a big cast-iron
vat of something like fish and rice or, usually, beans'(56). At this point in
time the Walls children became extremely self sufficient.
In the article
“What Makes a Good Parent?” Robert Epstein talks about the list of the ten most
important qualities parents should have. The parents in The Glass Castle had a very interesting way of parenting that was
somewhat successful. Rex Walls rates about a 3 in the realm of parenting. He
has a few good qualities about him, but there are more things wrong with his way
of parenting than good. He allows for his children to be independent beings and
find their own ways to entertain themselves. His children were very
self-sufficient and learned how to survive on their own at a very young age. At
times, Rex was also very loving and affectionate towards his kids, especially
Jeannette. Even though he could not provide for his family consistently he made
up for it in other ways. For instance, he took the time to teach the kids about
the world and gave them special things, like stars as birthday presents.
However, Rex was not the best provider financially, he also drank and was drunk
in front of his kids and acted very inappropriately in front of them. Rex and
Rose Mary also fought with each other in front of the kids, and that did not exactly
give them the best example of being a responsible parent. They should have
dealt with their problems in private.
However, Rose Mary taught the
children very well, and gave them the education that they needed to be
successful. She also tried to make sure that the children were fed when they
had food, and she did the regular things that other mothers do: cleaning, and
making sure the children had some sort of clothing on their backs. Rose Mary
was also very tolerant. She always supported Rex and his endeavors, even when
it was not out of the best interest of their family. She also supported Rex
when he said that they had to "skedaddle" and she would pack up the
children and made sure that they had the basic necessities to live. However,
Rose Mary also neglected her children when she was painting and she was not
very good about managing her problems. She depended on the children to help her
when she was in need of help. In a way her kids were parenting her instead of
her parenting them. The children helped her grade assignments, she slept in and
left it up to the kids to get ready to go, and she would escape into her own
world to paint pictures. Rose Mary and Rex raised 3 successful children and one
"failure" so they were 75% successful in raising their children, so I
guess you could say that they ironically did something right.
When Jeannette moved to the city and
her parents followed soon after. She did not want leave them in the dust, but
she also did not want to see them leave her life forever. She had said “I
didn't know what to do. Part of me wanted to do whatever I could to take care
of Mom and Dad, and part of me just wanted to wash my hands of them”(256). She
had also said “I think that maybe sometimes people get the lives they want” (236).
Her parents definitely got the lives that they wanted because if they wanted
otherwise they would have stayed in one place and committed themselves to one
place and not “skedaddled”.
Often, Parents nowadays are also bad
parents. The latest news story that just came out this week said that there had
been a nine-year old little girl named Savannah Hardin that had been ran to
death by her mother and grandmother for lying about eating a piece of candy. This
is what one could say is extreme parenting. This little girl died because she
lied about eating candy bar. That is an absolute tragedy. Her Mother and
Grandmother were arrested and are being charged with the death of Savannah
Hardin. This case is very extreme and this case makes Rex and Rose Mary Walls
look like the perfect parents. This case is extremely sad and upsetting, but it
validates that there are bad parents in the world, some worse than others.
In the end, Rex and Rose Mary did
somewhat of a good job raising their children and it was good that the children
grew up the way they did because it taught them to be independent,
self-sufficient, successful human beings. If they were raised any other way
they would not be the people that they are today, and Rex and Rose Mary deserve
some credit for letting their children be their own individual persons and
learn from their own mistakes.
Works Cited
Walls, Jeanette. The Glass Castle. New York: Scribner,
2005. Print.
Press,
Associated. "Savannah Hardin Forced to Run for 3 Hours, Dies; Jessica Mae
Hardin and
Joyce
Hardin Garrard Charged." WPTV. Channel 5 News, 24 Feb. 2012. Web. 26 Feb. 2012.
<http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/national/savannah-hardin-forced-to-run-for-3-hours-dies-jessica-mae-hardin-and-joyce-hardin-garrard-charged>.
Epstein, Robert.
"What Makes a Good Parent?" Scientific American Mind, Nov.-Dec. 2010.
Print.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)